Monday, May 12, 2008
Wisdom Couched In Silliness and Humor
In one scene "God" gives Evan Baxter's wife the following counsel: "Let me ask you something. If someone prays for patience, you think God gives them patience? Or does he give them the opportunity to be patient? If he prayed for courage does God give him courage or does he give him opportunities to be courageous?"
In another scene "God" asks Evan Baxter: "How do we change the world?" and Evan Baxter answers correctly when he says, "One single act of random kindness at a time" Learning this insight was especially pertinent and significant to Evan Baxter, a Buffalo newscaster who had been elected to Congress on the slogan, "Change the World." The first night he was in Washington Baxter prayed asking God to help him change the world. God heard Baxter and answered his prayer but in an unconventional way that Baxter hadn't expected. Baxter had had an optimistic zeal to change the world through the political system. Yet, the political system has its limitations because often personal agendas or even corruption gets in the way. God knew and Baxter learned that relying only on politicians to solve the world's problems wouldn't be sufficient.
Baxter comes to realize that God has called him to do a work. He exercises faith in that calling even when he others mock him and accuse of him of being crazy. Even for a short time his family leaves him not understanding what is going on with him.
Baxter's faith is also to be admired when taking into account that God hadn't given him a detailed blueprint on how to accomplish what he is being asked to do. At best he was only armed with a sketchy understanding of God's plans. Yet, God reassures Baxter telling him, "Whatever I do, I do because I love you." That love and Baxter's faith are tested when even after the ark is built and the community is ready to dismantle it, no flood comes. Baxter looks up to the sunny sky and expresses his frustration saying to God, "Is it too much to ask for a LITTLE PRECIPITATION?" God answers the prayer with a little precipitation but still no flood.
What Baxter didn't know, but God did, was the flood wasn't going to come because of rain but because of a break in a dam. Baxter learned that God has his own reasons for asking us to do certain things. Therefore, we only need to follow his directions and then leave the outcomes and timing up to him.
Not only did Baxter learn that God had chosen him for a work, but as he told a reporter, "He chose all of us." In other words, each of us has a work to do that we can fulfill if we'll pray to be a change agent, listen to the answer that may be unconventional, and continue to follow the instructions in the answer even if we can't see any results and/or others are mocking or chiding us.
Friday, May 9, 2008
Margaret Mead Would Be Impressed!
Even though this club has only been in existence a year and consists of only 15 members, it is a dynamic organization that is making a difference-- locally and internationally. Just take a look at this list:
- December 2006 the club provided Christmas to 3,000 Hispanic children in need.
- 2006-2008 the club participated in the Dictionary Project to provide dictionaries to 3rd graders in inner city schools.
- November 2007 the club organized its first international project in Cuba! It distributed over 2,000 pounds of school supplies, 5 wheel chairs, 500 glasses, and clothing and shoes to different schools.
- December 2007 the club held another successful toy drive for needy Hispanic children.
- June 2007 the club sponsored its first international exchange student
I know the members of this club quite well because I have attended a number of their meetings and festivities because on top of all these other impressive endeavors the club has supported my Lovejoy's Libros project to get books in Spanish and/or English into the hands and homes of our Hispanic students, the majority of which have NO books in their homes.
The club is not resting on its laurels. It already has plans for this coming June to provide Emergency Humanitarian Aid with the help of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints to the state of Chiapas, Mexico to help more than 4,000 people in 8 small villages who were affected by the floods and destruction in that area.
A HUGE thank you to the leaders and members of the Rotary Club of Hispano-Latinos of Salt Lake for being an inspiration and an example for all of us to follow. Margaret Mead would be impressed!
Sunday, April 27, 2008
I Was the Common Denominator
I felt like Jonah who tried running away from the Lord's calling for him to go to Nineveh--something he didn't want to do--but he found that he couldn't hide or run away from the Lord's plans for him.
It's a reminder to me that it isn't the situation that needs to change. It is I who needs to change and/or accept the direction the Lord wants for my life. So rather than trying to find someone or something to blame for my discomfort I need to be asking, "What lesson am I suppose to be learning?"
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Words Matter
What Obama said: "Don't tell me words don't matter! 'I have a dream.' Just words. 'We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal.' Just words. "We have nothing to fear but fear itself.' Just words. Just speeches. It's true that speeches don't solve all problems, but what is also true is if we cannot inspire the country to believe again than it doesn't matter how many policies and plans we have... Don't tell me that words don't matter."
Words have power. They can inspire, motivate, encourage, and even challenge us to be better and to take action. Great leadership historically has been about people who could put language to use to do just that.
All of us who want to inspire change must learn to use words in a powerful way--in our speaking and writing.
Sunday, February 17, 2008
Rising Above the Clouds
Rising above the clouds will also help us not get caught up in all the chaos taking place around us. On an After Words broadcast where Akbar Ahmed interviewed Mark Siegel, longtime friend and former speechwriter who helped Benazir Bhutto write Reconciliation, spoke of the glow Bhutto seemed to have about her in spite of the chaos as well as threats to her life. In other words, because of her focus on a higher purpose she was able to transcend what was happening around her.
Herndon L. Davis who is an author, lecturer, and TV Host gives us some insights into Bhutto's life that can be an example for us as we advocate for Hispanic learners. Davis said of her, "Bhutto could have easily remained safely in self-imposed exile. She could have kept a low profile and remained an observer....But instead Benazir Bhutto chose to become the change that she wanted to see for her country....She allowed her life to be used as a tool for a greater purpose, a greater cause and for a greater calling...Further Bhutto knew that her life was symbolic as a living example of patience, idealism, faith, and determination. (italics mine).
We, too, must not give up the fight for our Hispanic learners even though we are attacked on every side and in spite of the fact that we may not see the fruits of our labor. It never was about us anyway as Mother Theresa's words remind us.
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Hope and Change
"But if you listen to his -- speeches 'change,' 'hope.' I mean, it's a kind of-- it's an empty mantra. I mean a surprising degree of emptiness, of lack of specificity. What change? Change from what to what? What direction do you want to take the country? What do you mean by hope? There's never any specificity there because specificity is dangerous to a bargainer."
Earlier in the interview Shelby defined and explained a bargainer as " a black who enters the American, the white American mainstream by saying to whites in effect, in some code form, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt. I'm not going to rub the shame of American history in your face if you will not hold my race against me. Whites then respond with enormous gratitude. And bargainers are usually extremely popular people." Shelby goes onto explain that the bad side of this is that no one ends up telling the truth about what one really feels and thus in a way becomes invisible.
All of this has great application to education issues especially as it relates to the education of our diverse learners. It could very well explain why the achievement gap (s) continues to persist despite all the rhetoric. People have entered into some kind of bargain so no one is offended by speaking the truth---being specific about what needs to be changed and who needs to do the changing. Policy makers enter into the bargain agreement to keep their jobs and/or to be reelected. Result: Nothing changes and the achievement gap (s) continue to exist.
If the achievement gap (s) scenario is ever going to change we need people who because they are more concerned about the next generation than the next "election" will challenge the status quo by telling the truth--with hope.
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Influence Change
One resource included 5 ways to influence change in others:
- "Get" their perspective: It's the other person's perspective about the change that really matters. Valuing that perspective will help the other person feel part of the conversation, not that feel that one is being given a sales pitch.
- Acknowledge their perspective: Let the person feel that you recognize that the view is valid even if may be different than yours.
- Speak to their interests: Talk with the person about the differences in your perspectives, explaining how the change has personal benefits for him or her.
- Recognize natural tendencies: Recognize that not everyone moves at the same rate in regards to change.
- Be patient: Give a person time to reflect on what you have shared. This could help "save face" for a person who is moving from opposition to a change to being an advocate for the change.
Kevin has more information about change at his website, http://www.kevineikenberry.com/
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
Serendipity Strikes Again
I had the opportunity to participate in that call yesterday with Kevin. The insights he offered truly are remarkable, and they couldn't have come at a more opportune time.
Kevin strongly recommended that we share with a colleague what we learned --and the sooner the better--as that will help cement the ideas. Stephen Covey has offered the same advice. I felt my "blog" may be the best place to share and record what I learned.
Below are some of the points I learned and want to apply:
- If there is no need for change, there is no need for a leader
- Not everyone will be at the same place concerning change, and it's important to be ok with this
- People view change differently, attaching negative, positive, and/neutral emotions to it
- Be a proponent (not an "evangelist") for the change by emphasizing the positive benefits/rewards of the change and minimizing the risks
- People don't resist change as much as they resist being changed
- Acknowledge where people are in regards to the present state as they have been doing what they are doing for a long time
- Build a post-change vision that can be experienced with all the senses
- When talking about change, the conversation and dialogue need to be continually open and ongoing
- "Sell" individuals, not groups --by getting individuals engaged and involved will help build the momentum
- Call the change a journey (a process)
- Ask questions! Ask questions! Ask questions!
- Find language for the change that is not just a hollow slogan
Participating with Kevin in this learning conference call convinced me to personally commit to move from focusing on resistance, opposition, obstacles in relationship to change and focus on exciting, challenge, opportunity instead.
NOTE: For more information about Kevin Eikenberry and his work, including articles that can be downloaded, visit http://www.kevineikenberry.com/
Saturday, December 29, 2007
"For vs. For"
This is extremely difficult to do, especially when recommending change, because most people tend to choose the status quo rather than risk change, even if that change could have positive results.
The voucher debate in Utah is a good example of what can happen when sides resort to an attack tactic. More often than not in a situation such as this, the status quo wins.
There are some lessons to be learned from the Utah voucher debate:
Lesson #1: Rather than making vouchers the focus, it may have been more constructive to focus on the education of diverse learners, parental rights, teacher shortage, improving public schools, saving money, and/or some other issue.
Lesson #2: Rather than having a "for vs against" stance, a "for vs for" stance has a greater chance of a win-win. In other words, all sides of an issue present a solution platform to improve the education of diverse learners. This way, status quo is not an option. People will have to make a decision and not just vote against something because the proposed change is still fuzzy in their minds. Voting against something without having to offer an alternative solution is an easy out and doesn't take much thought.
Lesson #3: Sticking to one's own platform on how to address the issue explaining the rationale rather than attacking the other platform shows respect not only for the opposite side, but also for the American people.
Lesson #4: Trusting the American people to make a wise decision is a respectful manner that appeals to their mind as well as their heart.
These are lessons that all political candidates and those advocating for political issues might want to consider learning if we as American people are to be well served. We as the American people have a responsibility to continue to encourage that these lessons be learned through our example of words and actions.
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Raise the Education Banner
Stop tinkering, build common-good ed system
By John Florez
Published: November 19, 2007
Floods, fires, failing crops — it didn't matter. In times of crisis, Americans have pulled together. However, our debate over school vouchers revealed the ominous threat this generation faces: a loss of commitment to the common good. The debate centered on how to fix education against how to "save it" — privatization, choice, accountability, save the children, the poor and minorities. All were patchwork solutions to fix an outdated institution that is now making our nation lose ground in the global economy. Missing from the debate was the concern for our nation. It was parochial, all about "me." No one asked the question, How should we restructure our education system so our nation can succeed in a constantly changing world?
The crisis this generation faces is one of confidence and lack of leadership. Our nation was built and prospered by individuals who were not afraid to act. They did so with confidence in themselves and in their fellow citizens. They dared to dream and were not afraid to fail. Standing still when you have to defend your country or your family is not an option.
We have stopped believing in ourselves. We seem to be living in fear and unable to muster the will and the confidence past generations had. Today we are more divided and blaming each other for the failure of our schools, but much of the blame rests with the average citizen who sits back and does nothing.
My loving critics complain that I do not offer specific solutions. All too often, individuals look to others for solutions, but our democracy doesn't work that way. It was designed so that people kept informed and took action when our government needed a push — sometimes a big one. We live with the myth that leaders mean someone else, rather than seeing ourselves as leaders. The solutions rest with each of us. The voucher debate was started by leaders who had the courage to reach out to others and act.
Changing institutions requires leaders who offer a vision of what institutions ought to do that promote the public's interest, rather than tinkering with the system as we have done with education.
When the owners decided that the old downtown Key Bank Building was not worth fixing, it was blown up, making room for a newer building designed to meet today's needs. We need leaders who have the courage to do the same with education: Build a new education system that can prepare children and adults with the skills needed to succeed in the new economy.
The voucher fight also brought out the strengths of our people. We care enough to argue and to fight for our beliefs. It wasn't about vouchers. It was our way of trying to fix a failing system that has left caring citizens frightened about the future of our children. It also brought the ingredients needed to bring about change. It started with someone who stood up and offered a solution and found others with the same passion. That's the way our democracy works.
There was a tremendous amount of human energy mobilized and over $8 million spent. Can you imagine what we could do if we combined that passion and money to build a new system? What if we came together around a common goal to restructure our education system so it can prepare our people with the world-class skills needed to succeed in today's global economy?
As my friend the late Judge Frank Wilkins often said, "That's big medicine."
Utah native John Florez has founded several Hispanic civil rights organizations, served on the staff of Sen. Orrin Hatch and on more than 45 state, local and volunteer boards. He also has been deputy assistant secretary of labor. E-mail: jdflorez@comcast.net
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Dr. Kim Cameron's Wisdom: Virtuousness
This 6 page article, "Good or Not Bad: Standards and Ethics in Managing Change," by Dr. Kim Cameron from the University of Michigan, has had a profound impact on my thinking. Every leader who desires to make a difference will want to become familiar with Dr. Cameron's work.
In this particular article, Dr. Cameron emplains why an emphasis on positive practices, not merely the absence of negative or harmful practices, should be emphasized if an organization is to have successful performance. He calls these positive practives VIRTUOUSNESS. He points out that virtuousness is different than ethics which merely focuses on avoiding the negative.
Dr. Cameron goes onto stress that we live in a time when it is impossible to manage change when it is occurring constantly. For this reason it is essential that we have and live by unchanging, undisputed guiding principles. These fixed points or principles will give us stability in the midst of ambiguity and chaos.
To achieve this, Dr. Cameron adds, we must move from ethics. Ethic standards that focus on avoiding harm are not the same as standards that lead to doing good. In order to lead to doing good, ethical standards must be supplemented with what Dr. Cameron calls viruousness standards.
Viruousness is what individuals aspire to be when they are at there very best Dr. Cameron notes that these aspirations of virtuousness are universal and unchanging in essentially all societies, cultures, and religions.
The results of empirical research are revealing that organizations that are virtuous organizations significantly outperform less virtuous organizations with positive outcomes, not just the absence of negative outcomes.
Virtuousness obviously needs to be a topic for not only every management classroom, but it also should be included in the curriculum for every education leadership programs. It has the potential to make a huge difference for our diverse learners.
For more information on Dr. Cameron's work, visit his website: www.bus.umich.edu/Positive (Positive Organizational Scholarship) and/or read one or both of the books he co-authored:
- Leading With Values: Positivity, Virtue of High Performers
- Competing Values Leadership: Creating Values in Organizations.