Article #3:
Legislators shouldn't punish immigrant children
By John Florez
Published: February 4, 2008—Deseret News
Religious leaders have said immigration is a moral and humanitarian issue and have asked we view it with compassion. It is a message that must not be lost on our Utah legislators, some of whom seem to be considering laws based on fear, rather than compassion, such as the one denying in-state college tuition for undocumented students.
Last week, Catholic Bishop John C. Wester said immigrants are part of the human family and should be treated with dignity. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has called for compassion regarding immigration and welcomes all, including undocumented residents. Our nation's policies have been based on humanitarian principles and promulgated by our religious institutions; we are viewed around the world as holding the moral high ground. Utahns, especially, take pride in upholding our "Utah values" of family, compassion and caring for one another.
We were taught in our schools that we live in the land of opportunity and that with hard work and sacrifice we could realize our dreams. Teachers made us believe in ourselves. I was one of those students — a son of immigrant parents — who had teachers that were tough but gave us hope and taught us to have big dreams. Now there is a new generation of students sitting in today's classrooms with teachers who tell them the same and still give them hope — to work, study hard and succeed.
However, some legislators appear eager to exploit the fear in those looking for vulnerable scapegoats, then use immigrants for political gain. They argue costs. Yet last week, on the House Education Committee's agenda, two bills were passed: One denies in-state tuition to motivated students who will contribute to society, which would have cost the state only $350,000; and the other appropriates $1.5 million for post high school education for prison convicts. The message: Commit a felony and you can get a college education.
Some legislators fail to see the negative consequences of their actions. They not only douse the dreams teachers have instilled in students but, most destructive, demean and marginalize those students. The result is that such policies relegate a group of motivated students to a lifetime of poverty, when they could contribute to our state. There may be another Bill Gates in that group.
What is at stake in the debate are the values that have made us the compassionate and moral society for which we take pride and others look to as a beacon of hope. Unlike past generations that built our country out of hope, some of our leaders today are trying to make political gain out of fear. Rather than working for the common good and promoting the principles we claim to hold dear — compassion, humanitarianism — some lawmakers seem eager to make scapegoats out of the most vulnerable group in our society, children who have no voice.
Our religious leaders have called for legislators to make policies that reflect our moral and humanitarian values, but lawmakers ignore those pleas, saying they are responding to the public's wishes. If that's the case, how come they didn't listen when they quickly gave $35 million for a soccer stadium and voted for school vouchers, both contrary to the people's wishes?
I like to think the average citizen wants to see public policies reflect the values we live daily and teach our children. But unless the legislators hear from all of us, it will be business as usual.
Every child deserves hope.
Utah native John Florez has founded several Hispanic civil rights organizations, served on the staff of Sen. Orrin Hatch and on more than 45 state, local and volunteer boards. He also has been deputy assistant secretary of labor. E-mail: jdflorez@comcast.net
Monday, February 4, 2008
Do What Makes Sense
Article #2:
Denying education to undocumented immigrants doesn't make sense
By George E. Brooks
Article Last Updated: 02/04/2008 12:12:59 AM MST
Salt Lake Tribune
For the past four years I have been working very closely with Utah students for whom House Bill 241 would virtually eliminate the chances of pursuing postsecondary education.
I understand that the bill's sponsor, Rep. Glenn Donnelson, R-North Ogden, believes that HB241 would help solve the very real problem of illegal immigration; that removing the benefit of in-state tuition will somehow motivate the parents of would-be students to relocate or not come here intending to take advantage of this system.
This rationale is fundamentally flawed, as is understood by anyone with firsthand experience with these immigrants. To imagine that the prospect of resident tuition for their children crosses the minds of persons immigrating to work in this state is to either misunderstand or just ignore the more immediate and material factors that actually drive immigration.
To be candid and specific, the majority of the students affected by this bill are children of undocumented immigrants, brought here as infants or children with no choice in the matter, and raised here. If college is even academically an option for them it is because they have gone to school here, studied hard and successfully integrated into their communities.
A child of undocumented immigrant parents has no access to the resources that would enable him or her to attend college paying non-resident tuition. So, essentially, denying in-state tuition sends the message that, hard work or not, they will find only closed doors after high school. Rep. Donnelson contends that closing these doors to these undocumented members of our community will somehow serve as an immigration enforcement strategy, and that those who are impacted by the bill will just finish high school and go home to their country of origin.
,
The reality is that, by now, these students are more American than anything else. Those students who are here, who have grown up here, are not going to go away, and denying them an education is neither in their nor the state's best interests.
The argument that resident tuition for these students puts any kind of undue strain on the state is false. In the 2003-2004 school year, the 117 students statewide who took advantage of this resident tuition cost the state about $300,000 in lost tuition, according to state System of Higher Education figures.
That same year 10,424 nonresident students paid $34 million in tuition and fees over the in-state rate. And when one considers the long-term benefits of having motivated, well-educated, well-integrated second-generation Americans, the cost becomes even more negligible in comparison.
Again, we are talking about students who did not choose to come here but are now making choices about what kind of Americans they will be. Denying them access to college education is morally wrong and civically irresponsible. ---
* GEORGE E. BROOKS is an adjunct instructor at Snow College's International Center and coordinator and instructor for the Snow/Sanpete adult literacy program.
Denying education to undocumented immigrants doesn't make sense
By George E. Brooks
Article Last Updated: 02/04/2008 12:12:59 AM MST
Salt Lake Tribune
For the past four years I have been working very closely with Utah students for whom House Bill 241 would virtually eliminate the chances of pursuing postsecondary education.
I understand that the bill's sponsor, Rep. Glenn Donnelson, R-North Ogden, believes that HB241 would help solve the very real problem of illegal immigration; that removing the benefit of in-state tuition will somehow motivate the parents of would-be students to relocate or not come here intending to take advantage of this system.
This rationale is fundamentally flawed, as is understood by anyone with firsthand experience with these immigrants. To imagine that the prospect of resident tuition for their children crosses the minds of persons immigrating to work in this state is to either misunderstand or just ignore the more immediate and material factors that actually drive immigration.
To be candid and specific, the majority of the students affected by this bill are children of undocumented immigrants, brought here as infants or children with no choice in the matter, and raised here. If college is even academically an option for them it is because they have gone to school here, studied hard and successfully integrated into their communities.
A child of undocumented immigrant parents has no access to the resources that would enable him or her to attend college paying non-resident tuition. So, essentially, denying in-state tuition sends the message that, hard work or not, they will find only closed doors after high school. Rep. Donnelson contends that closing these doors to these undocumented members of our community will somehow serve as an immigration enforcement strategy, and that those who are impacted by the bill will just finish high school and go home to their country of origin.
,
The reality is that, by now, these students are more American than anything else. Those students who are here, who have grown up here, are not going to go away, and denying them an education is neither in their nor the state's best interests.
The argument that resident tuition for these students puts any kind of undue strain on the state is false. In the 2003-2004 school year, the 117 students statewide who took advantage of this resident tuition cost the state about $300,000 in lost tuition, according to state System of Higher Education figures.
That same year 10,424 nonresident students paid $34 million in tuition and fees over the in-state rate. And when one considers the long-term benefits of having motivated, well-educated, well-integrated second-generation Americans, the cost becomes even more negligible in comparison.
Again, we are talking about students who did not choose to come here but are now making choices about what kind of Americans they will be. Denying them access to college education is morally wrong and civically irresponsible. ---
* GEORGE E. BROOKS is an adjunct instructor at Snow College's International Center and coordinator and instructor for the Snow/Sanpete adult literacy program.
Preserving Language Is Worth It
I read three articles this morning that are so important--one related to language and two related to in-state tuition for undocumented students. Below is the first.
Teaching American Indian languages in schools is a tool that educators say has been tested as a way
By Jennifer Toomer-Cook and Deborah BulkeleyDeseret Morning News
Published: February 4, 2008
Teaching American Indian languages in schools is a tool that educators say has been tested as a way of raising the achievement bar. To that end, the State Board of Education is seeking $275,000 to preserve and revitalize Utah's indigenous languages to help narrow achievement gaps.
Utah's CRT state test results show a 45 percentage point difference between the performance of Navajo and Caucasian students on language arts, 48 percentage points on math and 57 percentage points on science, according to data state associate superintendent Brenda Hales presented to the Education Appropriations Committee Thursday.
The Education Board wants to include San Juan and Uintah School District's Ute Indian population in the proposed program. The Northern Band of Shoshone, Goshute and the Skull Valley tribe would be included in the future, under the proposal, which came out of the governor's fall Native American summit, Hales said.
"Take a look year after year at low test scores and a 50 percent dropout rate, we have a whole generation of students we're going to lose if we don't start making immediate attempts to help them," Hales said.
Following a pilot program in San Juan School District where students were immersed in Navajo Language classes, the gap closed to 15 percentage points in language arts, 23 percentage points in math and 10 percent in science.
Forrest Cuch, director of the Utah Office of Indian Affairs, said culture is also at stake and that Utah's five native nations need to work together with the state and federal governments to preserve them.
"We're losing our languages," Cuch said. "The federal government has come forward and Utah tribes would like the state to come forward."
In addition to the language funding, Sen. Ross Romero, D-Salt Lake, said he's requesting $350,000 to partner with KUED on an educational program highlighting Utah's five nations — Ute, Piute, Shoshone, Goshute and Navajo.
Salt Lake City School District multicultural director Janice Jones Schroeder passionately lobbied this past week for money to fund the language program. Schroeder, an American Indian, said the language of her ancestors has been lost, and with it part of herself.
"The more you deny bills like this you deny us as human beings," Schroeder said. "We're tired of being marginalized ... Our kids are not succeeding nationwide, in Utah and the schools I work for ... because we've been denied those rights ... to be who we are."
Committee Chairman Sen. Howard Stephenson wondered whether language preservation was the way to go, or if $275,000 could be better spent otherwise.
"When it's not spoken in the home ... how do we expect to require those students or encourage those students to keep that language alive?" he said. "Is it a reasonable expectation? Is it going be a useful language, or is it going to be something 100 years from now ... it's still gone?"
Responded Schroeder: "To me, every human being is worth more than $275,000."
E-mail: dbulkeley@desnews.com
© 2008 Deseret News Publishing Company All rights reserved
Teaching American Indian languages in schools is a tool that educators say has been tested as a way
By Jennifer Toomer-Cook and Deborah BulkeleyDeseret Morning News
Published: February 4, 2008
Teaching American Indian languages in schools is a tool that educators say has been tested as a way of raising the achievement bar. To that end, the State Board of Education is seeking $275,000 to preserve and revitalize Utah's indigenous languages to help narrow achievement gaps.
Utah's CRT state test results show a 45 percentage point difference between the performance of Navajo and Caucasian students on language arts, 48 percentage points on math and 57 percentage points on science, according to data state associate superintendent Brenda Hales presented to the Education Appropriations Committee Thursday.
The Education Board wants to include San Juan and Uintah School District's Ute Indian population in the proposed program. The Northern Band of Shoshone, Goshute and the Skull Valley tribe would be included in the future, under the proposal, which came out of the governor's fall Native American summit, Hales said.
"Take a look year after year at low test scores and a 50 percent dropout rate, we have a whole generation of students we're going to lose if we don't start making immediate attempts to help them," Hales said.
Following a pilot program in San Juan School District where students were immersed in Navajo Language classes, the gap closed to 15 percentage points in language arts, 23 percentage points in math and 10 percent in science.
Forrest Cuch, director of the Utah Office of Indian Affairs, said culture is also at stake and that Utah's five native nations need to work together with the state and federal governments to preserve them.
"We're losing our languages," Cuch said. "The federal government has come forward and Utah tribes would like the state to come forward."
In addition to the language funding, Sen. Ross Romero, D-Salt Lake, said he's requesting $350,000 to partner with KUED on an educational program highlighting Utah's five nations — Ute, Piute, Shoshone, Goshute and Navajo.
Salt Lake City School District multicultural director Janice Jones Schroeder passionately lobbied this past week for money to fund the language program. Schroeder, an American Indian, said the language of her ancestors has been lost, and with it part of herself.
"The more you deny bills like this you deny us as human beings," Schroeder said. "We're tired of being marginalized ... Our kids are not succeeding nationwide, in Utah and the schools I work for ... because we've been denied those rights ... to be who we are."
Committee Chairman Sen. Howard Stephenson wondered whether language preservation was the way to go, or if $275,000 could be better spent otherwise.
"When it's not spoken in the home ... how do we expect to require those students or encourage those students to keep that language alive?" he said. "Is it a reasonable expectation? Is it going be a useful language, or is it going to be something 100 years from now ... it's still gone?"
Responded Schroeder: "To me, every human being is worth more than $275,000."
E-mail: dbulkeley@desnews.com
© 2008 Deseret News Publishing Company All rights reserved
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)