Do What Makes Sense

Article #2:
Denying education to undocumented immigrants doesn't make sense
By George E. Brooks
Article Last Updated: 02/04/2008 12:12:59 AM MST
Salt Lake Tribune

For the past four years I have been working very closely with Utah students for whom House Bill 241 would virtually eliminate the chances of pursuing postsecondary education.

I understand that the bill's sponsor, Rep. Glenn Donnelson, R-North Ogden, believes that HB241 would help solve the very real problem of illegal immigration; that removing the benefit of in-state tuition will somehow motivate the parents of would-be students to relocate or not come here intending to take advantage of this system.

This rationale is fundamentally flawed, as is understood by anyone with firsthand experience with these immigrants. To imagine that the prospect of resident tuition for their children crosses the minds of persons immigrating to work in this state is to either misunderstand or just ignore the more immediate and material factors that actually drive immigration.

To be candid and specific, the majority of the students affected by this bill are children of undocumented immigrants, brought here as infants or children with no choice in the matter, and raised here. If college is even academically an option for them it is because they have gone to school here, studied hard and successfully integrated into their communities.

A child of undocumented immigrant parents has no access to the resources that would enable him or her to attend college paying non-resident tuition. So, essentially, denying in-state tuition sends the message that, hard work or not, they will find only closed doors after high school. Rep. Donnelson contends that closing these doors to these undocumented members of our community will somehow serve as an immigration enforcement strategy, and that those who are impacted by the bill will just finish high school and go home to their country of origin.
,
The reality is that, by now, these students are more American than anything else. Those students who are here, who have grown up here, are not going to go away, and denying them an education is neither in their nor the state's best interests.

The argument that resident tuition for these students puts any kind of undue strain on the state is false. In the 2003-2004 school year, the 117 students statewide who took advantage of this resident tuition cost the state about $300,000 in lost tuition, according to state System of Higher Education figures.

That same year 10,424 nonresident students paid $34 million in tuition and fees over the in-state rate. And when one considers the long-term benefits of having motivated, well-educated, well-integrated second-generation Americans, the cost becomes even more negligible in comparison.

Again, we are talking about students who did not choose to come here but are now making choices about what kind of Americans they will be. Denying them access to college education is morally wrong and civically irresponsible. ---

* GEORGE E. BROOKS is an adjunct instructor at Snow College's International Center and coordinator and instructor for the Snow/Sanpete adult literacy program.