Will Legislators Get the Message?

Because of the LDS church's strict policy of political neutrality on all but what it considers to be an important moral issue, it would be wise to listen when the church chooses to speak.


Even though other churches in Utah had been taking a stand on 2008 Utah legislative bills in regards to immigration, many were hoping that the LDS church would also speak out because of the fact that it is the predominant religion in Utah. Those hoping and even praying for this were not only LDS people, but many non-LDS people as well.


Recently Elder Marlin Jensen did speak out at a symposium held on Wednesday night (2/13/08)at Westminster College. He emphasized at this symposium that he was not speaking solely for himself, but that he had been sent by the LDS First Presidency and was speaking on its behalf. It is extremely important to keep this in mind when considering his following statements:

• "slow down, step back and carefully study and assess the implications and human costs involved."


• "with decisions handing in the balance that have such significant consequences, I believe a more thoughtful...not to mention humane, approach is warranted."


• "immigration questions are questions dealing with God's children," and legislators should "measure twice before they cut."


• "The church's view of someone in undocumented status is akin, in a way, to a civil trespass," relating it to coming on someone's property uninvited. "There is nothing inherent or wrong about that status."

....and Elder Jensen's asking Utah lawmakers to consider proposed immigration legislation with a "spirit of compassion" and to use a more "thoughtful and factual, not to mention humane, approach" to the issues.

Elder Jensen also noted that immigration is not only a political issue but a moral and ethical one as well.

Elder Jensen's remarks came on the heels of a January 11th meeting that a group of lawmakers had held with LDS Apostle M. Russell Ballard and other LDS Church officials. Rep. David Litvack said, "The basic message was that we need to step back, not be so reactive, and let cooler heads prevail." Even though the LDS church remains neutral on the specific action that should be taken on immigration legislation the message was that lawmakers need to listen once again because the legislation could be disastrous for new arrivals, hard-working and generally law-abiding individuals who, like all of our ancestors, are in search of a better life, and make our state a better place.

It is also important to note that Elder M. Russell Ballard is a member of the Alliance for Unity which is a group of civic, business and religious leaders that has taken a strong stand against the bill that would repeal the current law that allows undocumented students to pay in-state tuition in Utah's colleges and universities. Dr. Alexander Morrison, the leader of this group and an emeritus LDS general authority, said, "We are concerned about not wanting to take away the American dream from these kids, and these kids had come to America as little youngsters, as 2-or3-year olds, many of them, and how can you blame the sins, if there be sins, of their parents on their shoulders?"

The Alliance as a group states, "In our view, making a college education unaffordable to students simply discourages them and will result in their making less than the best of their intelligence and talents."

Dave Ure, the former representative who sponsored this tuition law said that because Congress will eventually have to act on immigration, "it is very short-sighted to repeal this bill."

Taking into consideration all these statements, and especially the timing of them, seem to indicate that the church has some concerns about the direction of some current state immigration legislation. Therefore, it is quite disconcerting and heart breaking at how some legislators, especially LDS legislators, are rationalizing and justifying immigration bills on the table saying such things as:

• "We have taken a very cautious approach." Dave Clark
• "They're [church leaders] just asking us to be deliberate in our process. We are living up to that." Rep. Dave Clark
• "they [church leaders] really want us to remember the human element" when debating the illegal immigration issues. "I do not see anything in this comment that says do not respect the rule of law." "We need to be compassionate but also remember the rule of law."Senator John Valentine
• "I don't know if we are compassionate if we ignore the law." Rep. Glenn Donnelson
• "I don't think there's any lack of compassion. I don't think anyone is rushing to judgment." Senator Margaret Dayton

I am wondering as Michael Clara is when he says, "I'm just wondering why legislators don't get the message."

It also seems that putting aside all immigration proposals and instead supporting Senate Bill 97 being sponsored by Sen. Scott Jenkins that would create a bipartisan "immigration task force" would mesh well with what cool and calm heads are suggesting and advising. Duane Cardall in his Editorial on February 15, 2008 reminds us that this measure has received strong support from Utah's business, manufacturing, and agricultural communities as they realize the unintended negative effect much of the state-based immigration reform could have on the state's economy.

If legislators will rise above all the emotion and rhetoric, exercise some humility, and really take to heart the wise counsel that is being suggested from a variety of arenas, they can concentrate on more important matters and not waste time addressing immigration issues that Congress will need to eventually address...and once they are addressed could very well nullify anything the state now decides.

Responding to Persecution

For Christmas my husband gave me the book Presidents and Prophets by Michael K. Winder. I finished reading it yesterday. It was obviously a book that couldn't be put down!

The word presidents in the title refers to the presidents of the United States and the word prophets refers to the leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Winder devotes a chapter to each U.S. president starting with George Washington and ending with George W. Bush revealing through correspondence, diary entries, newspaper articles, speeches, anecdotes, interviews, etc. the relationship between each president and the LDS Church.


Anyone who is familiar with Mormon history will be aware of the horrific persecution Mormons suffered. By mentioning this I am in no way diminishing the persecution others have faced whether religious or racial or any other. Nor am I discounting the argument that Mormons have been guilty of persecuting others. But this is not my point.


With the help of Winder's book I would like to focus on how the Mormon Church and its people responded to the persecution they suffered and how that response allowed the Church to move from persecution to political clout.

Appeals made to U. S. presidents by early LDS Church leaders for help in dealing with the persecution heaped upon them didn't bear much fruit. So how did the Church respond through the years to this lack of concern and support from the government?

• The Church remained loyal to the U. S. and continued to believe in the principles upon which this country was founded.
• The Church showed respect for government leaders, even those with whom it did not agree.
• The Church shared its resources.
• Most members of the church followed the counsel of church leaders to live their religion, to become educated, to excel in their work, to serve the country, to become exemplary citizens, and to be involved in civic affairs.

Employing this approach rather than wallowing in self-pity and focusing on all the ways they had been wronged, led to LDS people being appointed and elected to federal government positions, having U.S. presidents seek counsel and blessings from LDS church leaders, and even having bestowed upon the current LDS prophet and leader, Gordon B. Hinckley, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Needless to say, there is still work to be done on both sides of the aisle. The fact that presidential candidate Mitt Romney is having his LDS faith attacked rather than focusing on the fruits of his life should sadden all of us whether we agree with his political views or not. On the other side of the aisle we have LDS members who still need to learn to follow the counsel of Church leaders on how to be true neighbors to all people.

Religion: Not the Enemy

Throughout history in all parts of the world religion, more often than not, has been at the center of wars and conflicts as well as persecution, bigotry, and discrimination. Yet, identifying religion as the root cause may be identifying the wrong culprit.

There has been nothing in the teachings of my Christian LDS (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) experience that would encourage or condone this type of behavior. From my understanding of other religions, the same could be said for them.

In fact, the teachings from my Christian LDS experience have always been to love and care for my "neighbor." The story of the Good Samaritan teaches that neighbor is "anyone in need," transcending any social-cultural predicament. As Chang (2007) so aptly describes, this would include others of similarity, others of difference, and others of opposition. In Matthew 5:43-44, 46-47 of the New Testament Jesus teaches: "Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbor, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?"

The counsel that LDS members have repeatedly and consistently received from our LDS church leaders is to be respectful of others and their beliefs. The 11th Article of Faith of my LDS faith states: "We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may."

If these, or ones similar, are our religious teachings, why is religious bigotry--defined as intolerance, fear, and hatred of those different from ourselves-- such a common occurrence and so prevalent throughout the world, including the United States? I would venture to say that the real culprit is not religion, but people, especially people who excuse or condone their hateful and oppressive behavior in the name of religion.

Reference
Chang, H. (2007). Self-narratives for Christian multicultural educators: A pathway to understanding self and others. Retrieved October 15, 2007 from the World Wide Web
http://www.icctejournal.org/ICCTEJournal/past-issues/volume-1-issue-1/self-narratives-for-christian-multicultural-educators-a-pathway-to-understanding-self-and-others/?searchterm=chang