Religion: Not the Enemy

Throughout history in all parts of the world religion, more often than not, has been at the center of wars and conflicts as well as persecution, bigotry, and discrimination. Yet, identifying religion as the root cause may be identifying the wrong culprit.

There has been nothing in the teachings of my Christian LDS (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) experience that would encourage or condone this type of behavior. From my understanding of other religions, the same could be said for them.

In fact, the teachings from my Christian LDS experience have always been to love and care for my "neighbor." The story of the Good Samaritan teaches that neighbor is "anyone in need," transcending any social-cultural predicament. As Chang (2007) so aptly describes, this would include others of similarity, others of difference, and others of opposition. In Matthew 5:43-44, 46-47 of the New Testament Jesus teaches: "Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbor, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?"

The counsel that LDS members have repeatedly and consistently received from our LDS church leaders is to be respectful of others and their beliefs. The 11th Article of Faith of my LDS faith states: "We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may."

If these, or ones similar, are our religious teachings, why is religious bigotry--defined as intolerance, fear, and hatred of those different from ourselves-- such a common occurrence and so prevalent throughout the world, including the United States? I would venture to say that the real culprit is not religion, but people, especially people who excuse or condone their hateful and oppressive behavior in the name of religion.

Reference
Chang, H. (2007). Self-narratives for Christian multicultural educators: A pathway to understanding self and others. Retrieved October 15, 2007 from the World Wide Web
http://www.icctejournal.org/ICCTEJournal/past-issues/volume-1-issue-1/self-narratives-for-christian-multicultural-educators-a-pathway-to-understanding-self-and-others/?searchterm=chang

Teaching About Religion Is Critical to Multicultural Education

Teaching about religion is especially critical to multicultural education.

In 1988, a broad coalition of 17 religious and educational organizations published guidelines that distinguish between teaching about religion and religious indoctrination. The guidelines state, in part:

• The school's approach to religion is academic, not devotional.
• The school sponsors study about religion, not the practice of religion.
• The school educates about all religions; it does not promote or denigrate any religion nor does it press for student acceptance of any one religion.

In addition to these religious-liberty clauses, there are also three guiding principles that Charles Haynes calls the civic values at the heart of American citizenship. They are:

RIGHTS: The rights guaranteed by the Constitution are for citizens of all faiths and none.

RESPONSIBILITIES: Religious liberty depends upon a universal responsibility to respect that right or religious liberty for others.

RESPECT: Living with our differences, including religious difference, in a democracy requires a strong commitment to the civic values that enable people with diverse perspectives to treat each other with respect and civility.

When we teach about the many cultures and religions of our nation and the world, we must also simultaneously emphasize our common ground which is the values and responsibilities we share as American citizens.

Reference

Haynes, C. C. (2007). To advance religious freedom, teach about religion. Retrieved from the World Wide web http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/commentary.aspx?id=19421 on December 17, 2007.

Role of Religion

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." These words of the First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution prohibit government from establishing a religion and protects each person's right to practice (or not practice) any faith without government interference.

It is important for educators to have an thorough understanding of the meaning of the First Amendment in relationship to religion and public schools. The law concurs with Noddings (1998/1999) that the First Amendment does not prevent teaching about religion.

There are three main reasons why religion needs to be part of a public school education:

1. Religion and spirituality are part of who we are, not only as a country, but as a world, and have influenced both our public and private lives.



2. Ignorance about religion in religiously diverse societies, especially in the U. S. which is the most religiously diverse society on earth, is a root cause of intolerance, discrimination, prejudice, and stereotyping.



3. Teaching about religion is important and necessary if public schools are to provide students with a complete education. Much of history, art, music, literature and contemporary life is unintelligible without an understanding of the major religious ideas and influences that have shaped history and culture throughout the world.

In Abington v. Schempp (1963), the court stated: "[I]t might well be said that one's education is not complete without a study of comparative religion or the history of religion and its relationship to the advancement of civilization. It certainly may be said that the Bible is worthy of study for its literary and historic qualities. Nothing we have said here indicates that such study of the Bible or of religion, when presented objectively as part of a secular program of education, may not be affected consistently with the First Amendment."

Justice Tom Clark wrote for the Supreme Court concerning this same case saying: " A person cannot be fully educated without understanding the role of religion in history, culture, and politics...The law, constitutional or otherwise, is no impediment to the realization of this aim."

The question is no longer whether schools should teach about religion. That answer is a resounding "Yes"--In fact, it is a duty to do so.

Reference
Halford, J. M. (1998/1999). Longing for the sacred in schools: A conversation
with Nel Noddings. Educational Leadership, 56, 28-32.

Liberal Republican or Conservative Democrat?

At his the 2nd Annual Message to Congress on December 1, 1862, Abraham Lincoln said: "The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, we must think anew and act anew."


We could use similar words to describe our education system in our day. What worked in the past is not adequate for today, especially for our diverse learners.


The recent debate and eventual defeat of the private school voucher referendum in Utah has caused me to ponder the following question: Am I a liberal Republican or a conservative Democrat? My husband says there is no such thing, but if not, there is now. I'm just not sure which.

I find that my beliefs, opinions, and feelings are in tune with the Democrat compassionate stance when it comes to education issues, especially as they relate to diverse learners. I strongly support the Dream Act and bilingual education. Yet, expecting bureaucratic agencies, whether they be governmental or social, to solve the issue, is a pipe dream. Bureaucracies by their very nature support, encourage, and foster the status quo and conformity.

If we are going to meet the needs of our diverse learners, a stance that status quo is unacceptable must adamantly be taken. To overcome status quo will take an entrepreneurial spirit and attitude which is a trademark of the Republicans.

The bottom line question still remains after the voucher referendum defeat: How are the children? (Translation of Masai warrior greeting). This refers to all children--not just family related children. That is what the voucher debate and result should have been about.

Dr. William H. Jeynes argues the following which is worth pondering, "... to the extent to which religious schools promote parental involvement, religious commitment, and an overall more disciplined lifestyle, all of which relate to positive academic and social outcomes, it becomes very difficult to argue against allowing choice without sounding insular and self-serving. After all, even with low school choice participation rates, if the participant students of color are benefiting and the academic gap is reduced, it once again appears illogical and potentially racially oppressive and discriminatory to deny minority students the right to more fully reach their potential via a school choice system" (p.15).

How I or anyone else eventually defines one's self really isn't all that important. What is important to remember is: 1) We are facing a new challenge 2) Status quo is not an option and 3) The challenge is going to require us to think and act anew. The question is: Who is going to step forward?

Reference

Jeynes, W. H. (2007). Religion, intact families, and the achievement gap. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 3, 1-22.

Religion and Academic Achievement

Dr. Jeynes has recently published his work on the influence of intact families and religion on academic achievement. As indicated below, he has also written a book on this topic.

Non-Resident Fellow, Education
California State University, Long Beach
Department of Teacher Education
(562) 985-4506(562) 985-5733 (Fax)
Phone: 562-985-5619Email: wjeynes@csulb.edu

News
Dr. Jeynes is one of the nation's leading researchers on the influence of religiosity and attending religious schools. He has conducted the only meta-analysis ever undertaken examining these issues in a series of journal articles and in his book, Religion, Education, and Academic Success. He has also written dozens of academic journal articles, which have divulged among other things that when African American and Latino students are religious and from intact families, the achievement gap with white students disappears.William Jeynes is also the Chair of the Religion and Education group of the American Education Research Association.

Effects of Religious Commitment on Academic Achievement

I just read this morning a primary research paper called, The Effects of Religious Commitment on the Academic Achievement of Urban and Other Children, by Willliam H. Jeynes. For those of us interested in better serving our diverse learners, the findings from this research can definitely give us some food for thought.

Reference: Education and Urban Society 2003; 36; 44

Spiritual Leadership: Application of True, Unchanging Principles

Felt it was important to define spiritual leadership as it is being used in this blog. It is not the same thing as religion In fact, a person can be very religious without ever seeking spiritual principles to guide his/her life or circumstances.

There are true, unchanging PRINCIPLES that if unearthed can support research as well as direct it. True, unchanging principles sought after, discovered, and applied have the potential to make a difference for our diverse learners in a way nothing else can.

Therefore, not only does spiritual leadership not mean religion, it also has nothing to do with position or title. Anyone who has the courage, fortitude, and zeal to seek the hidden treasures of knowledge and wisdom (principles) related to multicultural education is employing and providing spiritual leadership.