Beyond Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic

Much of what I am going to share today comes from a paper published by Richard Rothstein in Phi Delta Kappan December 2006 titled, The Goals of Education.

The current overemphasis on academic skills in our schools is contrary to what leaders in American history have espoused. Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, and Thomas Jefferson all expressed goals for public education that expanded beyond reading and math. They felt there also needed to be political and moral goals.

Franklin thought history particularly important because "questions of right and wrong, justice and injustice, will naturally arise" as students debate historical issues "in conversation and writing." He also felt that physical fitness was as vital as intellectual fitness because "exercise invigorates the soul as well as the body."

There has been a fear throughout American history that public schools for the poor would include only basic reading and math skills and not the more important intellectual development that could empower the working class. As far back as 1830 in Pennsylvania a committee that had been appointed to examine urban public schools denounced urban schools for instruction that "extends [no] further than a tolerable proficiency in reading, writing, and arithmetic." Equality, the committee concluded, is but "an empty shadow" if poor children don't get an "equal education...in the habits, in the manners, and in the feelings of the community."

Horace Mann concluded after visiting Russia in 1837 that basic education in reading and arithmetic did not alone ensure democratic values. Students in Prussia were literate but supported autocracy. For this reason, Mann felt that schools in a democracy could not be held accountable for academics alone but must inculcate democratic moral and political values so that literacy would not be misused.

In 1938 the NEA which at the time was a quasi-governmental group composed of not only educators, but also professionals and policy makers in education, issued a report that proclaimed, "The safety of democracy will not be assured merely by making education universal." Or, in other words, making all Americans literate. The dictatorships [Germany, Italy, Japan, and the Soviet Union] have universal schooling and use this very means to prevent the spread of democratic doctrines and institutions.

Of course we want a literate American people, but we must also consider why that is important. I would conjecture that it is not only so each individual person can increase his or her earning power, but is also so that the principles of democracy that we treasure and value so highly will continue to exist. In order for the latter to occur, we must conclude that being literate for a democracy means more than being able to read, write, and do math.

We'll continue with this discussion tomorrow.

Teaching History and Multiculturalism

As I read LaVarr Webb's comments on David McCullough's visit to Utah in Utah Policy a couple of days ago, I felt that maybe it was time to tackle once again a controversial topic in the multicultural arena.

Historian Daniel Boorstein said, "Trying to plan the future without a sense of the past is like trying to plant cut flowers." Famed author and historian David McCullough states that if we are to be successful in the present, it is critical that we study history and be knowledgeable about the past

McCullough also made the following important points:

• "Because you were born into this particular era does not mean it has to be the limit of your experience. Move about in time, go places."


• "..you can't understand yourself or your country without a sense of your past."


• "History is a guide to navigation in perilous times. History is who we are and why we are the way we are."


• "..history is a larger way of looking at life."
  

In spite of the fact that probably most would agree with all these statements, the results revealed from one survey is indicative of what our young people know (or rather don't know) about history: The survey shows that almost half the kids polled don't know the purpose of the Declaration of Independence. And about 1 in 6 parents don't know that the document declared the American colonies free from British rule. The survey also shows that only about 1 in 8 children can correctly identify the nation's founding fathers, that only about half know that "the shot heard round the world" started the Revolution, and that a third don't know that the "Redcoats" were British soldiers who fought in the Revolution - and not in either the Civil War or World War I.

This is a travesty. Yet, there are some things happening in education that could help explain reasons for this. One is the focused emphasis on reading and math in order to meet NCLB mandates....and forgetting that teaching history could help with reading comprehension. Another reason could be the paranoid educators feel ---that while teaching history they may say or do something that is not politically correct and/or in contradiction to multicultural advocate demands.

Tomorrow's post will further address this issue--with help from the wisdom of David McCullough on this topic.