A colleague of mine in my BYU doctoral program, Sylvia Finlayson, brought to my attention during a conversation we were having a book called Out of America by Keith B. Richburg written in 1997. Even though I have not read the whole book, yet, I did read a review of the book by Wolf Roder. The contents of this "blog post" are based on that review.
Richburg has been a foreign correspondent for the Washington Post and has won several awards for his international reporting. From 1991-4 he was assigned to Africa and based in Nairobi. Being an African-American who had grown up in Detroit and knowing what it means to be Black in America Richburg was filled with excitement to be able to return to the land of his forefathers.
Although Richburg was hopeful that he would find much good in Africa, but as he "covers the coups, the wars, the massacres, from Liberia to Somalia, he comes to cherish his America heritage more and more." Even though remembrances of the atrocities of the slave trade are painful to recall, Richburg contemplates on what his life might have been like in Africa if the slave trade had not occurred. He comes to realize that he could be one of those anonymous bodies dumped into a mass grave.
Because of Richburg's Africa experience he comes to the conclusion that "he can only bless those unsung ancestors of his who survived capture, the middle passage, and the auction block to become Americans."
My personal comment: In spite of America's dark history as well as the racism and prejudice that continues today, the greatest hope for all people to eventually enjoy true freedom and rights lies within the borders of the United States of America.
Reference
Roder, Wolf (1997). Retrieved February 22, 2008 from the World Wide Web, www.unc.edu/~ottotwoRoderreview.html
Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Monday, February 11, 2008
"Wisdom of Our Years" Documentary
Yesterday I had the opportunity to visit the Calvary Baptist Church in Salt Lake City to see the premiere screening of "Wisdom of Our Years." It is a documentary about the experience of Blacks in Utah--their rich and hidden legacy.
Most of the seven men and women interviewed in the documentary came from the Deep South, escaping the harsh realities of the Jim Crow laws. Still it was hard in Utah because the discrimination and prejudice were subtler in Utah making it harder to know one's place and often didn't know the rules until it was too late. In other words, they had to learn to navigate de facto racism.
Yet, there was blatant discrimination and prejudice as well:
Most of the seven men and women interviewed in the documentary came from the Deep South, escaping the harsh realities of the Jim Crow laws. Still it was hard in Utah because the discrimination and prejudice were subtler in Utah making it harder to know one's place and often didn't know the rules until it was too late. In other words, they had to learn to navigate de facto racism.
Yet, there was blatant discrimination and prejudice as well:
- Blacks were only welcome in Chinese restaurants
- Blacks had to sit in theater balconies
- Blacks could only use the public swimming pools one day a week--the day life guards weren't on duty
- Blacks could only live and buy homes in certain areas because of unspoken restrictions
- Available jobs for blacks were largely in domestic service or the railroads
What impressed me the most in the documentary was the courage, stamina, strength, and spunk of these people who were interviewed. They challenged the injustice. One kept applying for a job as an elementary teacher until she finally was given the job. She was such an excellent teacher parents of all ethnic backgrounds wanted her to be their child's teacher. Another couple purposefully bought a house, with the help of a bank, in an area where neighbors didn't want Blacks.
More than these qualities, though, I was impressed with their insights and advice to the younger generation:
- Trust in God
- Get an education
- Take advantage of all the opportunities now open to you
- Have faith in your own worth
- See opportunities in spite of challenges and don't use obstacles as excuses
My heart was touched as I sensed no bitterness. Rather they had a deep spirituality which probably helped them to overcome any traces of bitterness and that helped them to have this deep well of wisdom.
Phyllis Caruth, the executive producer of the documentary, said that education is the purpose of her film--"I believe that the key is opening your heart to other people, hearing their stories." It definitely educated me and opened my heart. I highly recommend it as a documentary that every Utahn (and people in the U.S.) needs to see.
Note: To request a showing, contact Phyllis Caruth at (891) 414-0501.
Saturday, December 22, 2007
Let Mercy Season Justice
The following is a Co-ed that I submitted to the Salt Lake Tribune on December 21, 2007. Even though it's focus is on immigration, the principle is applicable to many education issues.
Someone said, “You can judge the greatness of a country by the number of people trying to get into it compared to the number trying to get out.” If this statement is true, then the United States is truly great when we consider that we not only have about 12 million illegal immigrants living here, but we also add about one million legal immigrants each year.
Our “spirit of hospitality” as Reverend John Webster, the bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Salt Lake City, would describe it is one contributor to the greatness of the United States. We understand that we have been given much in this land of opportunity, and we have been generous in our willingness to share that bounty.
Another contributor is that in spite of the fact that we have failed miserably throughout our history to live up to our ideals to treat each person with dignity, respect, and equity, the laws of this land still offer the greatest hope to combat the harmful effects of prejudice, discrimination, racism, and every other form of “ism.”
These attributes as well as others that contribute to America’s greatness also make responding to the immigration challenge that much more complex. Many are uncomfortable with proposals such as building longer and higher border fences and/or increasing illegal immigration raids because they are contrary to America’s “spirit of hospitality.”
Yet, this quiet, compassionate “spirit of hospitality”: voice is being drowned out with the deafening shouting words, “We must adhere to the ‘rule of law’.” It has left good and honest United States citizens in a quandary as they question if there is any possible way to reconcile these two conflicting voices. I would argue that not only can the two be reconciled, but they must be if America is to retain its greatness.
For this reconciliation to occur, there are some facts we must understand about the “rule of law.” First, “rule of law” is a principle that subjects the actions of both the government and the citizens to the law. Second, abiding by a “rule of law” prevents the “rule of men” which can lead to tyranny and abuse of power because of capricious whims.
Yet, an understanding of the “rule of law” is not sufficient. It must also be understood that law and justice are not synonyms. Although Abraham Lincoln was a staunch believer in the “rule of law,” it was he who also believed and taught aspiring lawyers that circumstances rather than the letter of the law should dictate the judgments of a case. He expressed this sentiment with the words, “I have always found that mercy bears richer fruits than strict justice.”
While law gives a society a set of important laws or rules to which to govern itself, equity and fairness allows for the subjective but necessary qualities of mercy and tolerance. One without the other is inadequate if justice is to occur. The scale of law and mercy must be balanced.
As we go forth to retain America’s greatness as we resolve the immigration issue, it would behoove all of to remember and employ the words Shakespeare uses in the Merchant of Venice, “And earthly power doth then show likest God’s when mercy seasons justice.”
Someone said, “You can judge the greatness of a country by the number of people trying to get into it compared to the number trying to get out.” If this statement is true, then the United States is truly great when we consider that we not only have about 12 million illegal immigrants living here, but we also add about one million legal immigrants each year.
Our “spirit of hospitality” as Reverend John Webster, the bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Salt Lake City, would describe it is one contributor to the greatness of the United States. We understand that we have been given much in this land of opportunity, and we have been generous in our willingness to share that bounty.
Another contributor is that in spite of the fact that we have failed miserably throughout our history to live up to our ideals to treat each person with dignity, respect, and equity, the laws of this land still offer the greatest hope to combat the harmful effects of prejudice, discrimination, racism, and every other form of “ism.”
These attributes as well as others that contribute to America’s greatness also make responding to the immigration challenge that much more complex. Many are uncomfortable with proposals such as building longer and higher border fences and/or increasing illegal immigration raids because they are contrary to America’s “spirit of hospitality.”
Yet, this quiet, compassionate “spirit of hospitality”: voice is being drowned out with the deafening shouting words, “We must adhere to the ‘rule of law’.” It has left good and honest United States citizens in a quandary as they question if there is any possible way to reconcile these two conflicting voices. I would argue that not only can the two be reconciled, but they must be if America is to retain its greatness.
For this reconciliation to occur, there are some facts we must understand about the “rule of law.” First, “rule of law” is a principle that subjects the actions of both the government and the citizens to the law. Second, abiding by a “rule of law” prevents the “rule of men” which can lead to tyranny and abuse of power because of capricious whims.
Yet, an understanding of the “rule of law” is not sufficient. It must also be understood that law and justice are not synonyms. Although Abraham Lincoln was a staunch believer in the “rule of law,” it was he who also believed and taught aspiring lawyers that circumstances rather than the letter of the law should dictate the judgments of a case. He expressed this sentiment with the words, “I have always found that mercy bears richer fruits than strict justice.”
While law gives a society a set of important laws or rules to which to govern itself, equity and fairness allows for the subjective but necessary qualities of mercy and tolerance. One without the other is inadequate if justice is to occur. The scale of law and mercy must be balanced.
As we go forth to retain America’s greatness as we resolve the immigration issue, it would behoove all of to remember and employ the words Shakespeare uses in the Merchant of Venice, “And earthly power doth then show likest God’s when mercy seasons justice.”
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
An Alternative Thought to Ponder by Izzy Kalman
These thoghts came from the newsletter of Izzy Kalman, author of Bullies2Buddies:
Racism and Freedom of Speech
I am a strong proponent of Freedom of Speech, and demonstrate repeatedly at my seminars through role- playing that the true practice of Freedom of Speech is the solution to bullying. It even works with racial, religious, gender, and sexual-orientation harassment. I have volunteers come up and play a bigot. When I try to stop them from expressing themselves, they continue to insult me and my group, and have no respect for me or my group. When I let them say what they want and treat them with respect, they inevitably stop insulting me and my group, and come away with more respect for me and my group.
Despite the obvious positive results of these demonstrations, some participants are so locked into thinking that no one should be permitted to insult anyone's background that they continue to insist that Freedom of Speech should not be permitted for such expression. One participant wrote that forbidding racial free speech has led to "civility" among the races.
These people don't realize that all it has led to is "civility." It has not led to meaningful relationships and friendships between the races. The races still, for the most part, stick to their own kind. And there is a good explanation for this. If I have to be so worried about hurting your feelings that I can be sued for saying something you might find offensive, I would rather stay away from you. I will be pleasant to you, but I'll stick to my own kind, where I don't have to worry about being sued for offending you. Because of this fear of being prosecuted for hurting each others feelings, it prevents us from eradicating our stereotypes. Destroying stereotypes requires us to get to know each other as human beings. By avoiding each other, we continue with our stereotypes. We keep them locked up inside, but they don't go away. And we deprive ourselves of the opportunity to get to know each other as fellow human beings.
On a few occasions, people - all from Hispanic countries - said to me following my presentations, that they were so happy to hear my views. They said things like, "Here in the United States, we can't make fun of anyone. Where I come from, everybody makes fun of each other, and if you are in a social situation and nobody insults you, you feel neglected." One psychologist approached me after a seminar and said he lived half of his life in Hawaii. Hawaii, he told me, has the greatest racial mix of all fifty States, but it also has the highest percentage of interracial births. In Hawaii, he told me, all the races make fun of each other. They don't go for this "political correctness" business. They can laugh at each other, and this breaks down racial barriers, bringing people closer to each other. The subject of racism has always concerned me, and in recent months, I have been contemplating tackling it - a rather daunting task. I have been a bit reluctant to do so because it is has become such a sensitive subject that I may be setting myself up for hateful attacks. Anyway, I have decided to take on this mission. To keep myself relatively safe, I will do it by advising my own group, the Jews, rather than tell other groups what they should do. In my forthcoming newsletters, I will be presenting my approach to ending discrimination, not by curtailing Freedom of Speech, but by correctly employing it. By the way, a horrific incident occurred this week. A hunter of Asian decent killed five of his fellow hunters. He said in his defense that he was racially insulted. I'm sure that those who fight for limiting freedom of speech will capitalize on this as proof how destructive racial insults are. It is easy to forget that the insults did not do the killing. People who don't know how to tolerate insults did the killing. And rather than teaching people how to tolerate insults without getting upset, we are teaching them that they SHOULD get upset by insults; that words kill and insults should not be tolerated - particularly insults about people's group affiliation. We are thereby unwittingly increasing the likelihood that people will want to kill when they are insulted. Best wishes, Izzy Kalman
Racism and Freedom of Speech
I am a strong proponent of Freedom of Speech, and demonstrate repeatedly at my seminars through role- playing that the true practice of Freedom of Speech is the solution to bullying. It even works with racial, religious, gender, and sexual-orientation harassment. I have volunteers come up and play a bigot. When I try to stop them from expressing themselves, they continue to insult me and my group, and have no respect for me or my group. When I let them say what they want and treat them with respect, they inevitably stop insulting me and my group, and come away with more respect for me and my group.
Despite the obvious positive results of these demonstrations, some participants are so locked into thinking that no one should be permitted to insult anyone's background that they continue to insist that Freedom of Speech should not be permitted for such expression. One participant wrote that forbidding racial free speech has led to "civility" among the races.
These people don't realize that all it has led to is "civility." It has not led to meaningful relationships and friendships between the races. The races still, for the most part, stick to their own kind. And there is a good explanation for this. If I have to be so worried about hurting your feelings that I can be sued for saying something you might find offensive, I would rather stay away from you. I will be pleasant to you, but I'll stick to my own kind, where I don't have to worry about being sued for offending you. Because of this fear of being prosecuted for hurting each others feelings, it prevents us from eradicating our stereotypes. Destroying stereotypes requires us to get to know each other as human beings. By avoiding each other, we continue with our stereotypes. We keep them locked up inside, but they don't go away. And we deprive ourselves of the opportunity to get to know each other as fellow human beings.
On a few occasions, people - all from Hispanic countries - said to me following my presentations, that they were so happy to hear my views. They said things like, "Here in the United States, we can't make fun of anyone. Where I come from, everybody makes fun of each other, and if you are in a social situation and nobody insults you, you feel neglected." One psychologist approached me after a seminar and said he lived half of his life in Hawaii. Hawaii, he told me, has the greatest racial mix of all fifty States, but it also has the highest percentage of interracial births. In Hawaii, he told me, all the races make fun of each other. They don't go for this "political correctness" business. They can laugh at each other, and this breaks down racial barriers, bringing people closer to each other. The subject of racism has always concerned me, and in recent months, I have been contemplating tackling it - a rather daunting task. I have been a bit reluctant to do so because it is has become such a sensitive subject that I may be setting myself up for hateful attacks. Anyway, I have decided to take on this mission. To keep myself relatively safe, I will do it by advising my own group, the Jews, rather than tell other groups what they should do. In my forthcoming newsletters, I will be presenting my approach to ending discrimination, not by curtailing Freedom of Speech, but by correctly employing it. By the way, a horrific incident occurred this week. A hunter of Asian decent killed five of his fellow hunters. He said in his defense that he was racially insulted. I'm sure that those who fight for limiting freedom of speech will capitalize on this as proof how destructive racial insults are. It is easy to forget that the insults did not do the killing. People who don't know how to tolerate insults did the killing. And rather than teaching people how to tolerate insults without getting upset, we are teaching them that they SHOULD get upset by insults; that words kill and insults should not be tolerated - particularly insults about people's group affiliation. We are thereby unwittingly increasing the likelihood that people will want to kill when they are insulted. Best wishes, Izzy Kalman
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)