Governor Mitt Romney withdrawing from the 2008 Presidential Race has given rise to some thoughts..and how they relate to those who advocate for diverse learners.
During one of the debates when Romney was getting "beat up" by the other candidates, in particular Sen. John McCain, he had a look on his face that said, "Why are you doing this to me? Aren't we suppose to be talking about issues?"
My husband and I weren't the only ones to notice this. The next day, January 31, 2008, we read a comment by John Hinderaker that summed it up quite well by saying, "Romney doesn't know how to fight dirty like his rivals: Businessmen, in my experience, are generally more idealistic than politicians. Businessmen really do make deals with a handshake. No one would dream of doing that with Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi or the Clintons. Turning a businessman loose in the political world is basically a mismatch. That's the sense I get of McCain's reaction to having Romney as his last serious rival. McCain can poke him in the eye, knee him in the groin, and the rule-following businessman has no idea how to respond."
We could substitute the word educator for businessman and run into the same problem when educators strive to advocate for policies that will benefit diverse learners. I'm not suggesting that educators need to learn to fight dirty, but they do need to understand the rules of the political game so they can be effective advocates in the political arena.
Showing posts with label advocates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label advocates. Show all posts
Friday, February 8, 2008
Monday, December 10, 2007
Why Haven't We?
"We can, whenever and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. We already know more than we need to do that. Whether or not we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we haven't so far" (Edmonds, 1979, p.23).
The hard question is, "Why haven't we?" When I proposed this question, quoting Dr. Edmonds, to Linda Darling Hammond when she was in Salt Lake City, Utah for an Education Policy Forum on September 12, 2007, she responded with an enlightening and thought provoking question: "Who are the 'we'?"
I have pondered on her response, and I believe it is a very good point. It could very well be that what Walter Kelly's creation, Pogo said, applies: "We met the enemy and it is us." In other words, educators, and especially education leaders, have a responsibility to become part of the "we" that knows what works for diverse learners and then advocate for the implementation of those programs, policies, procedures, processes, peoples, and places that will support what works.
Although we educators are becoming better at fulfilling the first part of the responsibility--at least to a degree---we are not doing a very good job at fulfilling the second part. Even if we do advocate, nothing much changes. We must go back to Edmonds' quote, and ask why that is.
Referring back to yesterday's "blog post," much is due to how the bureaucracy of schools supports the status quo. It takes a lot of courage to confront a bureaucracy that rewards status quo and conformity.
In my book My Years As A Hispanic Youth Advocate..and The Lessons I Have Learned, I quote Parker Palmer from his book Courage to Teach substituting the word "I."
"Know that as I teach in ways that honor my own values without conforming to the situation, the force of the institution will come down on my head causing me to risk status, security, money, or power. The alternative rewards offered by living according to my values are fragile compared to raises, promotions, and status that organizations bestow on loyalists" (Lovejoy, 2004, p. 267).
If education is going to change for our diverse learners, we need educators who are willing to take the risk to be nonconformists: "Here in America we are descended in spirit from revolutionists and rebels - men and women who dare to dissent from accepted doctrine." ~Dwight D. Eisenhower, address, Columbia University, 31 May 1954
References:
Edmonds, R. R. (1979). "Effective schools for the urban poor." Educational Leadership, 17, 15-27.
Lovejoy, B. L. (2004). My Years As A Hispanic Youth Advocate..and The Lessons I Have Learned. Salt Lake City: Self-published.
The hard question is, "Why haven't we?" When I proposed this question, quoting Dr. Edmonds, to Linda Darling Hammond when she was in Salt Lake City, Utah for an Education Policy Forum on September 12, 2007, she responded with an enlightening and thought provoking question: "Who are the 'we'?"
I have pondered on her response, and I believe it is a very good point. It could very well be that what Walter Kelly's creation, Pogo said, applies: "We met the enemy and it is us." In other words, educators, and especially education leaders, have a responsibility to become part of the "we" that knows what works for diverse learners and then advocate for the implementation of those programs, policies, procedures, processes, peoples, and places that will support what works.
Although we educators are becoming better at fulfilling the first part of the responsibility--at least to a degree---we are not doing a very good job at fulfilling the second part. Even if we do advocate, nothing much changes. We must go back to Edmonds' quote, and ask why that is.
Referring back to yesterday's "blog post," much is due to how the bureaucracy of schools supports the status quo. It takes a lot of courage to confront a bureaucracy that rewards status quo and conformity.
In my book My Years As A Hispanic Youth Advocate..and The Lessons I Have Learned, I quote Parker Palmer from his book Courage to Teach substituting the word "I."
"Know that as I teach in ways that honor my own values without conforming to the situation, the force of the institution will come down on my head causing me to risk status, security, money, or power. The alternative rewards offered by living according to my values are fragile compared to raises, promotions, and status that organizations bestow on loyalists" (Lovejoy, 2004, p. 267).
If education is going to change for our diverse learners, we need educators who are willing to take the risk to be nonconformists: "Here in America we are descended in spirit from revolutionists and rebels - men and women who dare to dissent from accepted doctrine." ~Dwight D. Eisenhower, address, Columbia University, 31 May 1954
References:
Edmonds, R. R. (1979). "Effective schools for the urban poor." Educational Leadership, 17, 15-27.
Lovejoy, B. L. (2004). My Years As A Hispanic Youth Advocate..and The Lessons I Have Learned. Salt Lake City: Self-published.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)